Amanda's Kitchen
Food Labelling in Canada
Canadian Centre for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) postcard
This postcard is adapted from a postcard mailer sent to CSPI members in August.  Please feel free to copy and paste into your own letter or e-mail.

Dear Mr. Burke,

I applaud Heath Canada for its new food-labelling proposal, but Health Canada could and should better protect consumers by:

Sincerely,
{Signature}
{Name}
{Address}
top
home
General mailing information
Back to food labelling homepage
Amanda's Kitchen letter

Dear Mr. Burke,

I would like to commend Heath Canada for its new food-labelling proposal, requiring packaged food to carry clear, easy-to-read, standardized nutritional labels.  These new labeling laws will benefit all Canadians by helping us make informed daily food choices.  However, despite the comprehensiveness of the proposal, there is room for some improvement and I urge Health Canada to consider the following amendments:

Require labeling for fresh meat, poultry, fish and seafood:
Fresh meats still play a large role in the diet of Canadians and are traditionally high in saturated fat and low in fibre.  Exempting these products from nutritional labeling would not be in the interest of public health, while proper labeling of meat products will help consumers compare the nutritional value of meats to alternatives, or choose healthier cuts or meat that are lower in fat.

Require that the amount of folic acid be reported on labels:
Folic acid is a nutrient where deficiency has been strongly linked to neural tube birth defects and high blood pressure.  Disclosure of this important nutrient will help women of child-bearing age to choose foods high in folic acid, thereby reducing the risk of this birth defect.  It will also help Canadians select heart-healthy foods as part of their balanced diet.

Do not exempt in-store baked goods:
Many in-store baked goods are high in calories, high in trans and saturated fat, and low in fibre and other nutrients.  They are not very different nutritionally from non-exempt products that have been baked off-site and packaged.

Tighten rules for making health claims:
Products that may prevent one disease but promote another should not be allowed to make health claims.  This is misleading to the public.  Only foods that are low in total, saturated and trans fat; cholesterol; sodium and added sugars should be eligible.  In addition, products should be required to give a minimum value per serving (i.e., one serving of product is equivalent to one serving of fruit), based on a serving size that is commonly used by Canadians.

Thank you for taking the time to consider to my concerns, and I urge Health Canada to continue to move forward with its food labeling reforms.

Sincerely,
{Signature}
{Name}
{Address}

top
home
General mailing information
Back to food labelling homepage
General mailing information
Health Canada's proposed revisions to the food laws are a welcome step in the right direction, and the Canadian government should hear how Canadians feel about these proposed changes.  Comments on the proposal are due by September 14th 2001.  Comments can be sent via e-mailto sche-ann@hc-sc.gc.ca, via fax to (613) 941-3537 or via regular mail to:
Amanda's Kitchen is devoted to introducing healthy 
vegetarian and vegan cooking to everyone's kitchen.
Disclaimer:  This newsletter and the Amanda's Kitchen web site are not prepared by a registered dietician, nurse, doctor or other medically-qualified individual.  Any health and nutrition information provided by Amanda's Kitchen is designed to support, not replace, information provided by a registered dietician or healthcare provider. Where appropriate, Amanda's Kitchen has endeavoured to support information contained on the site and newsletter by providing references to source data and, where possible, specific HTML links.
Page last updated: September 3rd, 2001